Searching for "civil litigators near me"? Look no further. Our dedicated civil litigation attorneys are skilled in navigating challenging legal terrains.
​
Our firm specializes in a broad range of litigation services, expertly navigating various complex legal landscapes to deliver outstanding representation for our clients. Our areas of focus include, but are not limited to, the following key domains:
-
Real Estate: We provide comprehensive legal support in matters involving property transactions, disputes, leases, and other real estate issues that our clients may face, ensuring that their interests are thoroughly protected throughout every stage of the process.
-
Construction: Our team is well-versed in the intricacies of construction law, guiding clients through disputes related to contracts, project delays, defects in construction, and compliance with regulations, all while striving to achieve the best possible outcomes.
-
Zoning: We have extensive experience in zoning and land use law, assisting clients in navigating the often-complex requirements necessary to obtain zoning approvals and variances, thereby ensuring that their development projects can move forward without unnecessary legal impediments.
-
Covenant Enforcement: Our firm is adept at enforcing contractual covenants, which may include restrictive covenants in real estate and business agreements, helping clients uphold their legal rights and maintain the integrity of their agreements in cases of breach.
-
Antitrust: We are equipped to handle antitrust litigation, addressing issues such as monopolistic practices and unfair competition, thereby helping our clients maintain a fair and competitive market environment while ensuring compliance with antitrust laws.
-
Contract: Our firm offers robust legal support in contract disputes, helping clients navigate issues related to breach of contract, interpretation of terms, and enforcement of agreements, ensuring that their contractual rights are effectively asserted and protected.
-
Banking: We specialize in banking litigation, representing clients in disputes that involve financial institutions, issues of lending and borrowing, regulatory compliance, and other banking-related matters, ensuring that our clients' financial interests are robustly defended.
-
Business Torts: Our litigation practice also encompasses a range of business torts, including cases of fraud, misrepresentation, and tortious interference, which can have significant implications for businesses; we strive to provide effective legal solutions to protect our clients' reputations and financial stability.
-
Executive Compensation: We provide legal guidance on disputes related to executive compensation packages, including the negotiation and enforcement of contracts and agreements, ensuring that executive clients receive their entitled benefits while navigating the intricacies of employment law.
​
In addition to our primary areas of litigation expertise, our firm also offers strategic support for business and municipal reorganizations, working closely with clients to facilitate the restructuring of their operations and streamline their organizational frameworks. This includes assisting with the legal aspects of mergers, acquisitions, and reorganizations, as well as navigating the regulatory requirements that may arise during the process. Our goal is to help clients achieve their operational objectives while minimizing legal risks and ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations.
​
At our civil litigation law firm, we pride ourselves on our client-centric approach. We believe that every case is unique, and we take the time to understand your specific needs and concerns. Our extensive and diverse experience allows us to tailor our strategies to fit your situation, ensuring that you receive personalized attention throughout the legal process. We are dedicated to building strong relationships with our clients, fostering open communication, and providing the support you need during challenging times. Your success is our priority, and we are committed to advocating for your best interests every step of the way.
​
With years of experience, our civil litigation lawyers are committed to providing top-notch legal representation. We strive for effective dispute resolution, ensuring you understand your rights and options. If you need a reliable litigation lawyer or a business litigation attorney, our team is ready to assist. Let's work together to achieve the best possible outcome for your case.
Reported Civil Litigation Cases
Supreme Court of Colorado
-
Franklin Bank. N.A. v. Bowling, 74 P .3d 308 (Colo. 2003).
-
Campbell v. Orchard Mesa Irrigation District, 972 P.2d 1037 (Colo. 1998).
-
Moffat County State Bank v. Told. 800 P.2d 1320 (Colo. 1990).
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. City of Lakewood. 788 P.2d 808 (Colo. 1990).
-
City and County of Denver v. Colorado River Water Conservation District, 696 P.2d 730 (Colo. 1985) amicus curiae for Vail Valley Consolidated Water District
-
Financial Associates. Ltd. v. G.E. Johnson Const. Co .. Inc.,723 P.2d 135 (Colo. 1986).
-
In re Adjudication of Priorities to the Right to the Use of Water for all Beneficial Purposes in Water District No. 36, 696 P.2d 730 (Colo. 1985).
-
Groditsky v. Pickney, 661 P.2d 279 (Colo. 1983)
-
Income Realty & Mortgage. Inc. v. Columbia Sa\4ngs and Loan Ass'n, 661 P .2d 257 (Colo. 1983) amicus curiae for Saving & Loan League of Colo. Inc.
-
Haugen v. Western Savings and Loan Ass'n of Denver, 649 P.2d 323 (Colo. 1982) amicus curiae for Saving & Loan League of Colo. Inc.
-
Medema Homes. Inc. v. Lynn, 647 P.2d 664 (Colo. 1982).
-
Empire Savings, Building and Loan Ass'n v. Otero Savings and Loan Ass'n, 640 P.2d 1151 (Colo. 1982).
-
Spiker v. City of Lakewood, 198 Colo 528, 603 P.2d 130 (1979).
-
Von Ehrenkrook v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n, 196 Colo. 179, 585 P .2d 589 (1978) amicus curiae for Savings & Loan League of Colorado.
-
Wasson v. Hogenson, 196 Colo. 183, 583 P.2d 914 (1978) amicus curiae for Special District Association of Colorado.
Colorado Court of Appeals
-
Roberts v. Adams, 47 P. 3d 690 (Colo. App. 2001).
-
Wells v. Lodge Properties. Inc., 976 P.2d 321 (Colo. App. 1998).
-
Richard Engineers. Inc. v. Spanel. 745 P.2d 1021 (Colo. App. 1987).
-
East Grand County School Dist. No. 2 v. Town of Winter Park, 739 P .2d 862 (Colo. App. 1987).
-
Intermountain Systems. Inc. v. Gore Valley/Big Horn Water Dists., 645 P.2d 872 (Colo. App. 1982).
-
Haugen v. Western Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. of Denver. 633 P.2d 497 (Colo. App. 1981) amicus curiae for Savings & Loan League of Colo. Inc.
-
Greensway Development Co. v. Academy Park Ltd., 44 Colo. App. 6, 608 P .2d 845 (1980)
-
Castlewood Corporation v. City and County of Denver. 41 Colo. App. 565, 594 P.2d 1026 (1978).
-
Seaman v. City Council of Littleton. 537 P.2d 1084 (Colo. App. 1973).
-
Roberts v. Industrial Comm'n of Colorado. 509 P.2d 1285 (Colo. App. 1973).
-
Ragen v. Williams. 494 P.2d 141 (Colo. App. 1971).
-
Northglenn Lease Venture v. O'Hayre, 903 P.2d 1205 (Colo. App. 1995).
-
People v. Atkins. 885 P.2d 243 (Colo. App. 1994).
-
Cottonwood Hill. Inc. v. Ansay. 709 P .2d 62 (Colo. App. 1985).
-
Financial Associates. Ltd. v. G.E. Johnson Const. Co.. 694 P.2d 345 (Colo. App. 1984).
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit
-
Lodge Tower Condominium Assoc. v. Lodge Properties, Inc., 85 F. 3d 476 (10th Cir. 1996).
-
Otero Savings and Loan Ass'n v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 655 F.2d 275 (10th Cir. 1981).
-
​​Quad Construction, Inc. v. Wm. A. Smith Contracting Co., 534 F.2d 1391 (10th Cir. 1976).
United States District Court for the District of Colorado
-
PeopleSoft Inc. v. Amherst. L.L.C., 369 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (D. Colo. 2005).
-
Lodge Tower Condominium Assoc. v. Lodge Properties. Inc., 880 F. Supp. 1370 (D. Colo. 1995).
-
Cal-Circuit ABCO. Inc. v. Solbourne Computer. Inc., 848 F. Supp. 1506 (D. Colo. 1994).
-
Alameda National Bank v. Kanchanapoom, 752 F. Supp. 367 (D. Colo. 1990)
-
Otero Savings and Loan Association v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 497 F. Supp. 370 (D. Colo. 1980).
-
Stauffer v. Town of Grand Lake, Slip Op. (D. Col.).
United States Bankruptcy Court
-
In re City of Colorado Springs Spring Creek General Improvement District, 187 B.R. 683 (D. Colo. 1995).
-
In re City of Colorado Springs Spring Creek General Improvement District, 177 B.R. 684 (D. Colo. 1995).
-
In re Colorado Centre Metropolitan District, 139 B.R. 534 (D. Colo. 1992).
-
In re Colorado Centre Metropolitan District,113 B.R. 25 (D. Colo. 1990).
-
In re Amdura Corporation, 121 B.R. 862 (D. Colo. 1990).
Class Action - Complex Litigation
-
Cross v. 21st Century Holding Co., 2004 wl 307306 (S.D. N.Y, Feb. 18 2004).
-
Cross v. Dickstein Partners. Inc., 172 F.R.D. 108, (S.D. N.Y. 1997).
-
In re Amino Acid Lysine Antitrust Litigation, 918 F. Supp. 1190 (N.D. Ill. 1996); MDL No. 1083.
-
In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust Litigation. 141 F.R.D. 556 (N.D. Ga. 1992); MDL 861 (N.D Ga.).
-
In re Drill Bits Antitrust Litigation. Red Eagle Resources Corp. v. Baker Hughes, Inc., et al., CA No. H-91-627 (S.D. Tex.).
-
In re Potash Antitrust Litigation. 162 F.R.D. 563 (D. Minn. 1995); Civil File No. 3-93-197 (D. Minn.) & MDL No. 981.
-
In re Carbon Dioxide Antitrust Litigation. 155 F.R.D. 209 (M.D. Fla. 1993); MDL No. 940 (M.D. Fla.).
-
In re Chain Link Fence Antitrust Class Action, Amco Steel Fence Co., et al. v. Master Halco, Inc., et al. CA No.89-B-1997, Consolidated (D. Col.).
-
In re Catfish Antitrust Litigation, 826 F. Supp. 1019 (N.D. Miss. 1993); Master File No. 2:92CV175-D-O & MDL No. 928 (N.D. Miss.).
-
McEwen v. Digitran Systems, Inc .. et al., (Digitran Securities Litigation), Civil No. 93C-728G (D. Utah 1994).
Uniform Code or Military Justice
-
U.S. v. Santo. 43 C.M.R. 134 {1970).
-
U.S. v. Baker. 43 C.M.R. 15 {1970).
-
U.S. v. Ervin. 42 C.M.R. 238 {1970).
-
U.S. v. Brown. 42 C.M.R. 183 {1970).
-
U.S. v. Jagow. 42 C.M.R. 105 {1970).
-
U.S. v. Marks. 41 C.M.R. 389 {1970).
-
U.S. v. Haagenson. 41 C.M.R. 332 (1970).
-
Priest v. Koch. 41 C.M.R. 243 (1970).
-
U.S. v. Hoff. 41 C.M.R. 246 {1970).
-
U.S. v. McDowell. 41 C.M.R. 151 (1969).
-
U.S. v. Brown. 41 C.M.R. 761 (1969).